NM_001163941.2:c.2743G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_001163941.2(ABCB5):c.2743G>C(p.Ala915Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001163941.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001163941.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCB5 | NM_001163941.2 | MANE Select | c.2743G>C | p.Ala915Pro | missense | Exon 23 of 28 | NP_001157413.1 | ||
| ABCB5 | NM_178559.6 | c.1408G>C | p.Ala470Pro | missense | Exon 14 of 19 | NP_848654.3 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCB5 | ENST00000404938.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2743G>C | p.Ala915Pro | missense | Exon 23 of 28 | ENSP00000384881.2 | ||
| ABCB5 | ENST00000258738.10 | TSL:1 | c.1408G>C | p.Ala470Pro | missense | Exon 14 of 19 | ENSP00000258738.6 | ||
| ABCB5 | ENST00000441315.1 | TSL:2 | n.244G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 8 | ENSP00000398692.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461664Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727158 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 34
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at