NM_001164444.2:c.611G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001164444.2(CBY3):c.611G>A(p.Arg204His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000433 in 1,384,542 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164444.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001164444.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBY3 | NM_001164444.2 | MANE Select | c.611G>A | p.Arg204His | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_001157916.1 | A6NI87 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBY3 | ENST00000376974.5 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.611G>A | p.Arg204His | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000366173.4 | A6NI87 | |
| CANX | ENST00000681674.1 | c.-80C>T | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 15 | ENSP00000505013.1 | P27824-1 | |||
| CANX | ENST00000681712.1 | c.-629C>T | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 16 | ENSP00000506061.1 | P27824-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000706 AC: 1AN: 141564 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000433 AC: 6AN: 1384542Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000732 AC XY: 5AN XY: 683220 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at