NM_001173990.3:c.-2G>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001173990.3(TMEM216):​c.-2G>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.014 in 1,535,262 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,611 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.074 ( 1429 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0074 ( 1182 hom. )

Consequence

TMEM216
NM_001173990.3 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.83

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TMEM216 (HGNC:25018): (transmembrane protein 216) This locus encodes a transmembrane domain-containing protein. Mutations at this locus have been associated with Meckel-Gruber Syndrome Type 2, and Joubert Syndrome 2, also known as Cerebello-oculorenal Syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
TMEM216 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Joubert syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 11-61392630-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-61392630-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 193188.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.253 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TMEM216NM_001173990.3 linkc.-2G>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 5 ENST00000515837.7 NP_001167461.1 Q9P0N5-1
TMEM216NM_001173991.3 linkc.-2G>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 5 NP_001167462.1 Q9P0N5-3
TMEM216NM_016499.6 linkc.-199G>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 5 NP_057583.2 Q9P0N5-2
TMEM216NM_001330285.2 linkc.-199G>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 5 NP_001317214.1 Q9P0N5J3QT25

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TMEM216ENST00000515837.7 linkc.-2G>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 5 2 NM_001173990.3 ENSP00000440638.1 Q9P0N5-1
TMEM216ENST00000334888.10 linkc.-2G>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 5 2 ENSP00000334844.5 Q9P0N5-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0738
AC:
11223
AN:
152108
Hom.:
1415
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.257
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0280
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000706
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0550
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0157
AC:
2117
AN:
134498
AF XY:
0.0118
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000952
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00918
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00739
AC:
10223
AN:
1383034
Hom.:
1182
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00637
AC XY:
4350
AN XY:
682482
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.264
AC:
8338
AN:
31562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0144
AC:
514
AN:
35690
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25168
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000280
AC:
1
AN:
35720
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000669
AC:
53
AN:
79216
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33864
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00765
AC:
43
AN:
5624
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000182
AC:
196
AN:
1078336
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0186
AC:
1078
AN:
57854
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
381
762
1142
1523
1904
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
242
484
726
968
1210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0741
AC:
11274
AN:
152228
Hom.:
1429
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0719
AC XY:
5350
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.257
AC:
10676
AN:
41508
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0279
AC:
427
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000828
AC:
4
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000706
AC:
48
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0545
AC:
115
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
408
815
1223
1630
2038
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
102
204
306
408
510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0209
Hom.:
131
Bravo
AF:
0.0834
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0190
AC:
68
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 26, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 2 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Jul 19, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.84
PhyloP100
1.8
PromoterAI
-0.095
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=300/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7107543; hg19: chr11-61160102; API