NM_001184.4:c.1328G>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001184.4(ATR):​c.1328G>C​(p.Arg443Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00082 in 1,613,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R443K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0041 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00048 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

ATR
NM_001184.4 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.978

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATR (HGNC:882): (ATR serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase and DNA damage sensor, activating cell cycle checkpoint signaling upon DNA stress. The encoded protein can phosphorylate and activate several proteins involved in the inhibition of DNA replication and mitosis, and can promote DNA repair, recombination, and apoptosis. This protein is also important for fragile site stability and centrosome duplication. Defects in this gene are a cause of Seckel syndrome 1. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
ATR Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Seckel syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Illumina, G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial cutaneous telangiectasia and oropharyngeal predisposition cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: Unknown, AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Seckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial prostate carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0033431053).
BP6
Variant 3-142561264-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-142561264-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 157963.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00408 (621/152176) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0138 (573/41502). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0129. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 298 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR,AD,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ATRNM_001184.4 linkc.1328G>C p.Arg443Thr missense_variant Exon 5 of 47 ENST00000350721.9 NP_001175.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATRENST00000350721.9 linkc.1328G>C p.Arg443Thr missense_variant Exon 5 of 47 1 NM_001184.4 ENSP00000343741.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00408
AC:
621
AN:
152058
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00106
AC:
266
AN:
251456
AF XY:
0.000758
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000607
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000815
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000481
AC:
703
AN:
1461734
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000385
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
727164
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0173
AC:
580
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000693
AC:
31
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39674
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000696
AC:
6
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000108
AC:
12
AN:
1111908
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
74
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.467
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
36
72
108
144
180
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00408
AC:
621
AN:
152176
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00401
AC XY:
298
AN XY:
74404
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0138
AC:
573
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00209
AC:
32
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000882
AC:
6
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00473
AC:
10
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
33
66
99
132
165
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000662
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00468
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0138
AC:
61
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00123
AC:
150
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Jun 21, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cutaneous telangiectasia and oropharyngeal predisposition cancer syndrome Benign:2
Feb 08, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Seckel syndrome 1 Benign:2
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Feb 08, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Jul 02, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Sep 08, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.085
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.57
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.87
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.059
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.65
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.63
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.34
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.76
T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0033
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;.
PhyloP100
0.98
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.33
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.025
Sift
Uncertain
0.0090
D;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;.
Polyphen
0.090
B;.
Vest4
0.17
MVP
0.34
MPC
0.24
ClinPred
0.0040
T
GERP RS
1.6
Varity_R
0.084
gMVP
0.15
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28367453; hg19: chr3-142280106; API