NM_001193282.4:c.1676A>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001193282.4(CFAP99):c.1676A>C(p.Lys559Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000554 in 1,462,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/15 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K559E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001193282.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001193282.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFAP99 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.1676A>C | p.Lys559Thr | missense | Exon 15 of 16 | ENSP00000488922.2 | D6REC4 | ||
| CFAP99 | c.1679A>C | p.Lys560Thr | missense | Exon 15 of 16 | ENSP00000530102.1 | ||||
| RNF4 | TSL:4 | c.-306A>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000423186.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 152124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000970 AC: 6AN: 61876 AF XY: 0.000138 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000550 AC: 72AN: 1309962Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000728 AC XY: 47AN XY: 645320 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74442 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at