NM_001193282.4:c.1759G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001193282.4(CFAP99):c.1759G>C(p.Glu587Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000211 in 1,469,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/15 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E587K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001193282.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001193282.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFAP99 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.1759G>C | p.Glu587Gln | missense | Exon 15 of 16 | ENSP00000488922.2 | D6REC4 | ||
| CFAP99 | c.1762G>C | p.Glu588Gln | missense | Exon 15 of 16 | ENSP00000530102.1 | ||||
| RNF4 | TSL:4 | c.-223G>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000423186.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000658 AC: 10AN: 152042Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000406 AC: 3AN: 73888 AF XY: 0.0000467 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000159 AC: 21AN: 1317012Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000170 AC XY: 11AN XY: 648870 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74380 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at