NM_001199013.2:c.738-3145C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001199013.2(STPG1):c.738-3145C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0405 in 1,489,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,419 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001199013.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- van der Woude syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- van der Woude syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001199013.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STPG1 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.738-3145C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000337461.4 | Q5TH74-1 | |||
| STPG1 | TSL:1 | n.4211-3145C>T | intron | N/A | |||||
| GRHL3 | TSL:2 | c.1696G>A | p.Glu566Lys | missense splice_region | Exon 16 of 16 | ENSP00000288955.5 | Q8TE85-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0304 AC: 4625AN: 152146Hom.: 98 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0322 AC: 3301AN: 102552 AF XY: 0.0319 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0417 AC: 55679AN: 1336736Hom.: 1321 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0409 AC XY: 26767AN XY: 654368 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0303 AC: 4619AN: 152264Hom.: 98 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0293 AC XY: 2185AN XY: 74452 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at