NM_001200049.3:c.8006T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001200049.3(CFAP46):c.8006T>C(p.Leu2669Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000304 in 1,612,786 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001200049.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAP46 | ENST00000368586.10 | c.8006T>C | p.Leu2669Pro | missense_variant | Exon 58 of 58 | 5 | NM_001200049.3 | ENSP00000357575.4 | ||
CFAP46 | ENST00000639072.2 | c.*229T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 59 of 59 | 5 | ENSP00000491877.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000446 AC: 11AN: 246798 AF XY: 0.0000521 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000260 AC: 38AN: 1460576Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000303 AC XY: 22AN XY: 726610 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000941 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74366 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.2942T>C (p.L981P) alteration is located in exon 23 (coding exon 23) of the CFAP46 gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 2942, causing the leucine (L) at amino acid position 981 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at