NM_001206641.3:c.47G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001206641.3(COA6):c.47G>C(p.Ser16Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.515 in 1,604,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 218,446 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S16I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001206641.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001206641.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COA6 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.47G>C | p.Ser16Thr | missense | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000355574.5 | Q5JTJ3-2 | ||
| COA6 | TSL:1 | c.-182G>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000479686.1 | Q5JTJ3-3 | |||
| COA6-AS1 | TSL:5 | n.177C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.598 AC: 90920AN: 152106Hom.: 29060 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.526 AC: 120956AN: 229908 AF XY: 0.513 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.506 AC: 735150AN: 1452684Hom.: 189330 Cov.: 61 AF XY: 0.503 AC XY: 362967AN XY: 722014 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.598 AC: 91023AN: 152226Hom.: 29116 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.592 AC XY: 44063AN XY: 74416 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at