NM_001256545.2:c.2175C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001256545.2(MEGF10):c.2175C>T(p.Ser725Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00064 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 38 hom. )

Consequence

MEGF10
NM_001256545.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.67

Variant links:

Genes affected

MEGF10 (HGNC:29634): (multiple EGF like domains 10) This gene encodes a member of the multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein family. The encoded protein plays a role in cell adhesion, motility and proliferation, and is a critical mediator of apoptotic cell phagocytosis as well as amyloid-beta peptide uptake in the brain. Expression of this gene may be associated with schizophrenia, and mutations in this gene are a cause of early-onset myopathy, areflexia, respiratory distress, and dysphagia (EMARDD) as well as congenital myopathy with minicores. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

MEGF10 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).

BP6

Variant 5-127438509-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-127438509-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 350659.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.67 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000637 (97/152288) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0183 (88/4816). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0152. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 73 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 38 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MEGF10	NM_001256545.2 link	c.2175C>T	p.Ser725Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 25	ENST00000503335.7	NP_001243474.1	Q96KG7-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MEGF10	ENST00000503335.7 link	c.2175C>T	p.Ser725Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 25	1	NM_001256545.2	ENSP00000423354.2	Q96KG7-1
MEGF10	ENST00000274473.6 link	c.2175C>T	p.Ser725Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 26	1		ENSP00000274473.6	Q96KG7-1
MEGF10	ENST00000506709.1 link	n.416C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 4 of 5	3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000644

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0183

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00216

AC:

538

AN:

249472

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00289

AC XY:

390

AN XY:

135014

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0172

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000358

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000653

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00107

AC:

1562

AN:

1461842

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00151

AC XY:

1095

AN XY:

727224

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0168

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000207

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00131

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000637

AC:

AN:

152288

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000980

AC XY:

AN XY:

74458

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0183

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.0000981

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000140

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00635

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

MEGF10-related myopathy

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Oct 18, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

MEGF10-related disorder

Benign:1

Feb 21, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

CADD

Benign

0.16

DANN

Benign

0.52

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over