NM_001267550.2:c.10256G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.10256G>A​(p.Ser3419Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.901 in 1,613,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 659,693 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S3419D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.87 ( 58493 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.90 ( 601200 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.424

Publications

42 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.0760812E-6).
BP6
Variant 2-178759031-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178759031-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46582.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.925 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.10256G>A p.Ser3419Asn missense_variant Exon 44 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7
TTNNM_133379.5 linkc.10256G>A p.Ser3419Asn missense_variant Exon 44 of 46 ENST00000360870.10 NP_596870.2 Q8WZ42-6Q7Z3B7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.10256G>A p.Ser3419Asn missense_variant Exon 44 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7
TTNENST00000360870.10 linkc.10256G>A p.Ser3419Asn missense_variant Exon 44 of 46 5 NM_133379.5 ENSP00000354117.4 Q8WZ42-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.874
AC:
132817
AN:
152050
Hom.:
58459
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.845
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.952
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.918
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.791
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.790
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.892
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.931
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.898
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.841
AC:
211211
AN:
251152
AF XY:
0.852
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.847
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.571
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.913
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.768
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.892
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.930
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.871
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.904
AC:
1321141
AN:
1461700
Hom.:
601200
Cov.:
63
AF XY:
0.903
AC XY:
656319
AN XY:
727154
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.846
AC:
28322
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.586
AC:
26205
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.917
AC:
23956
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.792
AC:
31403
AN:
39670
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.796
AC:
68672
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.889
AC:
47482
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.929
AC:
5356
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.931
AC:
1035540
AN:
1111884
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.898
AC:
54205
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6909
13818
20726
27635
34544
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21464
42928
64392
85856
107320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.873
AC:
132893
AN:
152168
Hom.:
58493
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.868
AC XY:
64528
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.844
AC:
35045
AN:
41506
American (AMR)
AF:
0.719
AC:
10979
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.918
AC:
3187
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.790
AC:
4085
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.790
AC:
3810
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.892
AC:
9449
AN:
10596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.949
AC:
279
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.931
AC:
63291
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.900
AC:
1900
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
828
1656
2484
3312
4140
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
894
1788
2682
3576
4470
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.910
Hom.:
280873
Bravo
AF:
0.857
TwinsUK
AF:
0.931
AC:
3453
ALSPAC
AF:
0.929
AC:
3581
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.844
AC:
3717
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.932
AC:
8019
ExAC
AF:
0.851
AC:
103320
Asia WGS
AF:
0.801
AC:
2790
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.935
EpiControl
AF:
0.932

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:12
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 09, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 30, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 15, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 11, 2012
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.075
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.78
Eigen
Benign
-0.89
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.93
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.085
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.60
T;T;T;.;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000011
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
PhyloP100
0.42
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.45
N;N;.;.;N;N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.10
Sift
Benign
0.63
T;T;.;.;T;T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.50
.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.0, 0.0030
.;.;.;B;.;.;B;B
Vest4
0.053
MPC
0.078
ClinPred
0.0026
T
GERP RS
-3.2
Mutation Taster
=64/36
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2291310; hg19: chr2-179623758; COSMIC: COSV107410185; API