NM_001267550.2:c.42071A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.42071A>G​(p.His14024Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0236 in 1,612,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 661 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.021 ( 69 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.024 ( 592 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
2
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:23

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.87

Publications

17 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0016076267).
BP6
Variant 2-178634803-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178634803-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46952.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0898 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.42071A>G p.His14024Arg missense_variant Exon 229 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.42071A>G p.His14024Arg missense_variant Exon 229 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3272
AN:
152124
Hom.:
70
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0966
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00807
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0452
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0216
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0290
AC:
7181
AN:
247948
AF XY:
0.0271
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00505
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0335
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0142
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.103
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0475
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0271
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0239
AC:
34837
AN:
1460612
Hom.:
592
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0233
AC XY:
16952
AN XY:
726568
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00410
AC:
137
AN:
33384
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0317
AC:
1415
AN:
44584
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0143
AC:
374
AN:
26110
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0957
AC:
3793
AN:
39638
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00695
AC:
598
AN:
86084
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0490
AC:
2614
AN:
53382
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0101
AC:
58
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0220
AC:
24429
AN:
1111354
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0235
AC:
1419
AN:
60318
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1974
3948
5922
7896
9870
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
980
1960
2940
3920
4900
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3269
AN:
152242
Hom.:
69
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0220
AC XY:
1636
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00459
AC:
191
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0232
AC:
354
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0190
AC:
66
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0968
AC:
499
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00745
AC:
36
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0452
AC:
480
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0231
AC:
1568
AN:
68000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
45
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
164
328
491
655
819
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0232
Hom.:
196
Bravo
AF:
0.0199
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0251
AC:
93
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0228
AC:
88
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00547
AC:
20
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0205
AC:
168
ExAC
AF:
0.0291
AC:
3512
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0360
AC:
126
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0199
EpiControl
AF:
0.0215

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 29, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 11, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 24, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 16, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Feb 04, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.19
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.94
Eigen
Benign
0.036
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.21
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T;T;T;.;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0016
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.93
.;.;.;L;.;.;L
PhyloP100
5.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.60
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.7
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.53
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Vest4
0.28
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.015
T
GERP RS
5.0
Mutation Taster
=59/41
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2288563; hg19: chr2-179499530; COSMIC: COSV99045732; COSMIC: COSV99045732; API