NM_001267550.2:c.82798G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.82798G>A​(p.Ala27600Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00654 in 1,613,570 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 523 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 267 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0038 ( 256 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

3
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.02

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0016045868).
BP6
Variant 2-178563334-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178563334-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47418.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.108 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.82798G>A p.Ala27600Thr missense_variant Exon 326 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.82798G>A p.Ala27600Thr missense_variant Exon 326 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0323
AC:
4910
AN:
152036
Hom.:
265
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.111
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00634
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000765
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0220
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00856
AC:
2123
AN:
248072
AF XY:
0.00655
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.113
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00554
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00558
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000280
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000732
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00415
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00385
AC:
5620
AN:
1461416
Hom.:
256
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.00338
AC XY:
2456
AN XY:
726998
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.118
AC:
3942
AN:
33460
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00597
AC:
267
AN:
44708
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00700
AC:
183
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000757
AC:
3
AN:
39624
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000325
AC:
28
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53396
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00625
AC:
36
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000604
AC:
671
AN:
1111718
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00810
AC:
489
AN:
60360
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
371
742
1113
1484
1855
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
132
264
396
528
660
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0324
AC:
4925
AN:
152154
Hom.:
267
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0314
AC XY:
2336
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.111
AC:
4606
AN:
41510
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0127
AC:
194
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00634
AC:
22
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000388
AC:
2
AN:
5150
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000765
AC:
52
AN:
67994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0217
AC:
46
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
230
460
690
920
1150
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
50
100
150
200
250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0124
Hom.:
226
Bravo
AF:
0.0373
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0975
AC:
398
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000951
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.0105
AC:
1273
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00722
AC:
26
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000830

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 19, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 30, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 07, 2022
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 24, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala25032Thr in exon 275 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 9.5% (323/3075) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/rs11896637). -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 06, 2015
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
May 16, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 14, 2012
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.93
Eigen
Benign
-0.18
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.078
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0016
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
.;.;.;L;.;.;L
PhyloP100
5.0
PrimateAI
Benign
0.42
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.087
Sift
Benign
0.13
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.020
.;.;.;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.17
MPC
0.084
ClinPred
0.031
T
GERP RS
3.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11896637; hg19: chr2-179428061; API