NM_001283009.2:c.2274G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001283009.2(RTEL1):​c.2274G>A​(p.Ala758Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.756 in 1,605,792 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 465,069 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A758A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.79 ( 47801 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.75 ( 417268 hom. )

Consequence

RTEL1
NM_001283009.2 synonymous

Scores

3

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.98

Publications

35 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RTEL1 (HGNC:15888): (regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1) This gene encodes a DNA helicase which functions in the stability, protection and elongation of telomeres and interacts with proteins in the shelterin complex known to protect telomeres during DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with dyskeratosis congenita and Hoyerall-Hreidarsson syndrome. Read-through transcription of this gene into the neighboring downstream gene, which encodes tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6b, generates a non-coding transcript. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
RTEL1-TNFRSF6B (HGNC:44095): (RTEL1-TNFRSF6B readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring RTEL1 (regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1) and TNFRSF6B (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6b, decoy) genes on chromosome 20. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 20-63690302-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-63690302-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 403400.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.98 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.868 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RTEL1NM_001283009.2 linkc.2274G>A p.Ala758Ala synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 35 ENST00000360203.11 NP_001269938.1 Q9NZ71-6R4IXY3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RTEL1ENST00000360203.11 linkc.2274G>A p.Ala758Ala synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 35 5 NM_001283009.2 ENSP00000353332.5 Q9NZ71-6
RTEL1ENST00000508582.7 linkc.2346G>A p.Ala782Ala synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 35 2 ENSP00000424307.2 Q9NZ71-7
RTEL1ENST00000370018.7 linkc.2274G>A p.Ala758Ala synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 35 1 ENSP00000359035.3 Q9NZ71-1
RTEL1-TNFRSF6BENST00000492259.6 linkn.2234G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 23 of 35 5 ENSP00000457428.1 D6RA96

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.785
AC:
119362
AN:
152006
Hom.:
47755
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.876
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.815
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.765
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.749
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.290
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.724
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.800
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.778
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.776
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.783
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.736
AC:
182107
AN:
247270
AF XY:
0.739
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.880
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.734
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.751
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.279
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.803
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.779
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.750
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.753
AC:
1094386
AN:
1453668
Hom.:
417268
Cov.:
69
AF XY:
0.753
AC XY:
543510
AN XY:
721870
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.885
AC:
29548
AN:
33372
American (AMR)
AF:
0.732
AC:
32511
AN:
44406
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.752
AC:
19547
AN:
25998
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.303
AC:
11944
AN:
39464
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.732
AC:
62974
AN:
85980
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.804
AC:
41603
AN:
51764
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.775
AC:
4453
AN:
5746
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.765
AC:
847261
AN:
1106968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.743
AC:
44545
AN:
59970
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15275
30551
45826
61102
76377
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20274
40548
60822
81096
101370
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.785
AC:
119466
AN:
152124
Hom.:
47801
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.782
AC XY:
58177
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.876
AC:
36358
AN:
41514
American (AMR)
AF:
0.765
AC:
11689
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.749
AC:
2599
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.291
AC:
1502
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.724
AC:
3494
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.800
AC:
8472
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.793
AC:
233
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.776
AC:
52732
AN:
67956
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.780
AC:
1645
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1260
2519
3779
5038
6298
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
850
1700
2550
3400
4250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.790
Hom.:
20006
Bravo
AF:
0.783
Asia WGS
AF:
0.544
AC:
1893
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4Other:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 27, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 28, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

Jul 10, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The RTEL1 c.2346G>A (p.Ala782Ala) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 88140/118930 control chromosomes (33801 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.7411082, which is approximately 663 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RTEL1 variant (0.001118), indicating the variant is the major allele and is benign. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

not specified Benign:4
Mar 06, 2018
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The A "variant" is the major allele in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs2236506). -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 24, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 89% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 85. Only high quality variants are reported. -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 5 Benign:1
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 3 Benign:1
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 5;C4225346:Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 3 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
CADD
Benign
0.73
DANN
Benign
0.84
PhyloP100
-3.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2236506; hg19: chr20-62321655; COSMIC: COSV58893321; COSMIC: COSV58893321; API