NM_001290043.2:c.1932+9C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001290043.2(TAP2):c.1932+9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.267 in 1,586,668 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58,881 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001290043.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- MHC class I deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- MHC class I deficiency 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001290043.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAP2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1932+9C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000364032.3 | Q03519-1 | |||
| ENSG00000250264 | TSL:2 | c.1932+9C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000391806.2 | E7ENX8 | |||
| TAP2 | c.1965+9C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000513734.1 | A0A8V8TNJ0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.261 AC: 39662AN: 151882Hom.: 5455 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.289 AC: 60170AN: 208310 AF XY: 0.294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.267 AC: 383734AN: 1434668Hom.: 53416 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.271 AC XY: 192733AN XY: 710992 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.261 AC: 39693AN: 152000Hom.: 5465 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.269 AC XY: 19995AN XY: 74286 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at