NM_001292063.2:c.4866C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):c.4866C>T(p.Val1622Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000138 in 1,550,544 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

OTOG
NM_001292063.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.74

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

OTOG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOG links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).

BP6

Variant 11-17610166-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17610166-C-T is described in CliVar as Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 505540.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-17610166-C-T is described in CliVar as Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 505540.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-17610166-C-T is described in CliVar as Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 505540.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-17610166-C-T is described in CliVar as Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 505540.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.74 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOG	NM_001292063.2 link	c.4866C>T	p.Val1622Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 36 of 56	ENST00000399397.6	NP_001278992.1	H9KVB3
OTOG	NM_001277269.2 link	c.4902C>T	p.Val1634Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 35 of 55		NP_001264198.1	Q6ZRI0-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOG	ENST00000399397.6 link	c.4866C>T	p.Val1622Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 36 of 56	5	NM_001292063.2	ENSP00000382329.2	H9KVB3
OTOG	ENST00000399391.7 link	c.4902C>T	p.Val1634Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 35 of 55	5		ENSP00000382323.2	Q6ZRI0-1
OTOG	ENST00000342528.2 link	n.2204C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 12 of 22	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00219

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000261

AC:

AN:

149344

AF XY:

0.000311

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000285

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00191

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000133

AC:

186

AN:

1398384

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000145

AC XY:

100

AN XY:

689726

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000316

AC:

AN:

31598

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000280

AC:

AN:

35698

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00207

AC:

AN:

25180

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35738

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

79234

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

48240

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000175

AC:

AN:

5700

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000100

AC:

108

AN:

1078980

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000241

AC:

AN:

58016

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000188

AC XY:

AN XY:

74330

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41434

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000262

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000250

AC:

AN:

68010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.493

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000507

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000215

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Aug 10, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 23, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Jan 24, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Val1634Val in exon 35 of OTOG: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.2% (16/8344) o f Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http: //gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs780581249). -

OTOG-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 16, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.68

CADD

Benign

1.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.68

PhyloP100

-1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over