NM_001301071.2:c.1562T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001301071.2(DOK7):c.1562T>C(p.Val521Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000202 in 1,535,692 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/11 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001301071.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital myasthenic syndrome 10Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- fetal akinesia deformation sequence 3Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- fetal akinesia deformation sequence 1Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001301071.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152072Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000149 AC: 2AN: 134286 AF XY: 0.0000274 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000202 AC: 28AN: 1383620Hom.: 0 Cov.: 61 AF XY: 0.0000190 AC XY: 13AN XY: 682788 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152072Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74280 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at