NM_001305581.2:c.611G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001305581.2(LRMDA):c.611G>A(p.Gly204Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00509 in 1,613,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 366 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G204G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001305581.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- oculocutaneous albinism type 7Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001305581.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRMDA | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.611G>A | p.Gly204Glu | missense | Exon 7 of 7 | ENSP00000480240.1 | A0A087WWI0 | ||
| LRMDA | TSL:1 | c.527G>A | p.Gly176Glu | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000361577.1 | Q9H2I8 | ||
| LRMDA | TSL:1 | n.965G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 8 of 8 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0281 AC: 4266AN: 152064Hom.: 195 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00717 AC: 1804AN: 251456 AF XY: 0.00510 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00270 AC: 3942AN: 1461734Hom.: 171 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00223 AC XY: 1619AN XY: 727190 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0281 AC: 4270AN: 152182Hom.: 195 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0267 AC XY: 1987AN XY: 74406 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at