NM_001329788.2:c.817C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_001329788.2(ZPLD1):c.817C>T(p.Arg273Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000929 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R273L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001329788.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001329788.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZPLD1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.817C>T | p.Arg273Trp | missense | Exon 9 of 12 | ENSP00000418253.1 | Q8TCW7-1 | ||
| ZPLD1 | TSL:1 | c.865C>T | p.Arg289Trp | missense | Exon 8 of 11 | ENSP00000307801.1 | Q8TCW7-2 | ||
| ZPLD1 | TSL:1 | c.817C>T | p.Arg273Trp | missense | Exon 15 of 18 | ENSP00000420265.1 | Q8TCW7-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 250800 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000684 AC: 10AN: 1461768Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727192 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74474 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at