NM_001354604.2:c.366C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001354604.2(MITF):​c.366C>T​(p.His122His) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00314 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 18 hom. )

Consequence

MITF
NM_001354604.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.06

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MITF (HGNC:7105): (melanocyte inducing transcription factor) The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor that contains both basic helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper structural features. The encoded protein regulates melanocyte development and is responsible for pigment cell-specific transcription of the melanogenesis enzyme genes. Heterozygous mutations in the this gene cause auditory-pigmentary syndromes, such as Waardenburg syndrome type 2 and Tietz syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
MITF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Tietz syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Waardenburg syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Waardenburg syndrome type 2A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • coloboma, osteopetrosis, microphthalmia, macrocephaly, albinism, and deafness
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • renal cell carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Waardenburg syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • Waardenburg-Shah syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 3-69937833-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-69937833-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 226728.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00207 (315/152262) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00477 (23/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00326. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 140 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 18 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MITFNM_001354604.2 linkc.366C>T p.His122His synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 10 ENST00000352241.9 NP_001341533.1
MITFNM_000248.4 linkc.45C>T p.His15His synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 9 ENST00000394351.9 NP_000239.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MITFENST00000352241.9 linkc.366C>T p.His122His synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 10 1 NM_001354604.2 ENSP00000295600.8 O75030-1
MITFENST00000394351.9 linkc.45C>T p.His15His synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 9 1 NM_000248.4 ENSP00000377880.3 O75030-9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00207
AC:
315
AN:
152144
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00893
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00477
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00289
AC:
725
AN:
250976
AF XY:
0.00318
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000862
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000694
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000555
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00326
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00325
AC:
4748
AN:
1461718
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00328
AC XY:
2385
AN XY:
727162
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000388
AC:
13
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000872
AC:
39
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
309
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00595
AC:
513
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000543
AC:
29
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00486
AC:
28
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00324
AC:
3604
AN:
1111926
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00353
AC:
213
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.448
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
255
510
766
1021
1276
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
144
288
432
576
720
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00207
AC:
315
AN:
152262
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00188
AC XY:
140
AN XY:
74440
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000578
AC:
24
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
16
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00893
AC:
31
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00477
AC:
23
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
2
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00318
AC:
216
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000945
AC:
2
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
28
42
56
70
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00339
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00205
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00360
EpiControl
AF:
0.00332

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Jun 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MITF: BP4, BS2 -

Feb 21, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 12, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Sep 27, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 24, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

His122His in exon 3 of MITF: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.3% (30/8600) of Eur opean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs140663277). -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Oct 09, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Oct 02, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Waardenburg syndrome type 2A Benign:2
Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tietz syndrome;C1860339:Waardenburg syndrome type 2A;C3152204:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MITF-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 20, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Tietz syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial melanoma Benign:1
Sep 19, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.62
PhyloP100
6.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=93/7
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140663277; hg19: chr3-69986984; API