NM_001369.3:c.12878G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.12878G>A(p.Ser4293Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000905 in 1,613,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S4293S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00056 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.779

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAH5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

primary ciliary dyskinesia 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
primary ciliary dyskinesia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

DNAH5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.016816497).

BP6

Variant 5-13716518-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13716518-C-T is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 407258.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	NM_001369.3 link	c.12878G>A	p.Ser4293Asn	missense_variant	Exon 74 of 79	ENST00000265104.5	NP_001360.1	Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAH5	ENST00000265104.5 link	c.12878G>A	p.Ser4293Asn	missense_variant	Exon 74 of 79	1	NM_001369.3	ENSP00000265104.4		Q8TE73
DNAH5	ENST00000681290.1 link	c.12833G>A	p.Ser4278Asn	missense_variant	Exon 74 of 79			ENSP00000505288.1		A0A7P0Z455

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000539

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00191

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

251058

AF XY:

0.0000663

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00160

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000411

AC:

AN:

1461488

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000316

AC XY:

AN XY:

727044

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00134

AC:

AN:

33472

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39660

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86248

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

5756

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111726

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000215

AC:

AN:

60366

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.439

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000565

AC:

AN:

152288

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00200

AC:

AN:

41568

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000946

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.510

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000482

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000582

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00136

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000165

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3476

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Dec 02, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 09, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 28, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

DNAH5-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 06, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.074

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.70

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.93

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.036

Eigen

Benign

-0.68

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.52

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.72

LIST_S2

Benign

0.70

M_CAP

Benign

0.0097

MetaRNN

Benign

0.017

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.19

PhyloP100

0.78

PrimateAI

Benign

0.38

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.78

REVEL

Benign

0.043

Sift

Benign

0.060

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.16

MVP

0.29

MPC

0.25

ClinPred

0.043

GERP RS

0.58

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.54

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over