NM_001369.3:c.13569C>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.13569C>A(p.Asp4523Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000256 in 1,614,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00082 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.261

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAH5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0079782605).

BP6

Variant 5-13700794-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13700794-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163131.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=4}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000821 (125/152218) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00267 (111/41534). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00227. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 57 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	NM_001369.3 link	c.13569C>A	p.Asp4523Glu	missense_variant	Exon 78 of 79	ENST00000265104.5	NP_001360.1	Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	ENST00000265104.5 link	c.13569C>A	p.Asp4523Glu	missense_variant	Exon 78 of 79	1	NM_001369.3	ENSP00000265104.4	Q8TE73
DNAH5	ENST00000681290.1 link	c.13524C>A	p.Asp4508Glu	missense_variant	Exon 78 of 79			ENSP00000505288.1	A0A7P0Z455
DNAH5	ENST00000683611.1 link	n.902C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 4 of 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000822

AC:

125

AN:

152100

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00266

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000382

AC:

AN:

251334

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000375

AC XY:

AN XY:

135828

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00332

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000792

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000198

AC:

289

AN:

1461860

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000199

AC XY:

145

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00317

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000157

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00302

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000459

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000695

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000821

AC:

125

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000766

AC XY:

AN XY:

74422

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00267

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000396

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00108

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00340

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000338

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3

Uncertain:4

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

May 11, 2018

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

Feb 18, 2021

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 22, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Uncertain:1Benign:2

May 15, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 17, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 21, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Asp4523Glu in exon 78 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.3% (15/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs151080414). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.11

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.55

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

0.23

DANN

Benign

0.34

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.030

Eigen

Benign

-1.4

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.3

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.72

LIST_S2

Benign

0.80

M_CAP

Benign

0.059

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0080

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.95

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.53

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.58

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.65

REVEL

Benign

0.23

Sift

Benign

1.0

Polyphen

0.040

Vest4

0.30

MutPred

0.34

Loss of sheet (P = 0.0817);

MVP

0.28

MPC

0.40

ClinPred

0.016

GERP RS

-6.7

Varity_R

0.073

gMVP

0.38

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over