NM_001374258.1:c.2247+3A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.2127+3A>G variant in the BRAF gene is 0.151% (23/10398) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA130842/MONDO:0021060/004

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00043 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000060 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRAF
NM_001374258.1 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.01395
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.369
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRAF (HGNC:1097): (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) This gene encodes a protein belonging to the RAF family of serine/threonine protein kinases. This protein plays a role in regulating the MAP kinase/ERK signaling pathway, which affects cell division, differentiation, and secretion. Mutations in this gene, most commonly the V600E mutation, are the most frequently identified cancer-causing mutations in melanoma, and have been identified in various other cancers as well, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colorectal cancer, thyroid carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, hairy cell leukemia and adenocarcinoma of lung. Mutations in this gene are also associated with cardiofaciocutaneous, Noonan, and Costello syndromes, which exhibit overlapping phenotypes. A pseudogene of this gene has been identified on the X chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRAFNM_001374258.1 linkc.2247+3A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 18 of 19 ENST00000644969.2 NP_001361187.1
BRAFNM_004333.6 linkc.2127+3A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 17 of 17 ENST00000646891.2 NP_004324.2 P15056

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRAFENST00000644969.2 linkc.2247+3A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 18 of 19 NM_001374258.1 ENSP00000496776.1 A0A2R8Y8E0
BRAFENST00000646891.2 linkc.2127+3A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 17 of 17 NM_004333.6 ENSP00000493543.1 P15056

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000427
AC:
65
AN:
152202
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000167
AC:
42
AN:
251252
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000162
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
135786
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00215
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000596
AC:
87
AN:
1459778
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000468
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
726178
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000989
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000116
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000427
AC:
65
AN:
152320
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000443
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000278
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000559

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Mar 31, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 14, 2014
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

RASopathy Benign:2
Apr 18, 2017
ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance: Benign
Review Status: reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method: curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.2127+3A>G variant in the BRAF gene is 0.151% (23/10398) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) -

Dec 22, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Noonan syndrome 7 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Lung cancer;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C1835047:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 1;C3150970:Noonan syndrome 7;C3150971:LEOPARD syndrome 3;C4551602:Noonan syndrome 1;CN029449:Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 Benign:1
May 06, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRAF-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 05, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided Benign:1
Feb 29, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

LEOPARD syndrome 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 04, 2025
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.91

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.014
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.17
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs371976102; hg19: chr7-140439609; API