NM_001376.5:c.4395+2C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PVS1_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.4395+2C>T variant causes a splice donor, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000224 in 1,614,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001376.5 splice_donor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contracturesInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
- intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- neuronopathy, distal hereditary motorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2OInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disabilityInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNC1H1 | NM_001376.5 | c.4395+2C>T | splice_donor_variant, intron_variant | Intron 20 of 77 | ENST00000360184.10 | NP_001367.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNC1H1 | ENST00000360184.10 | c.4395+2C>T | splice_donor_variant, intron_variant | Intron 20 of 77 | 1 | NM_001376.5 | ENSP00000348965.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000408 AC: 62AN: 152036Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000665 AC: 167AN: 251080 AF XY: 0.000640 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000205 AC: 300AN: 1461856Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000182 AC XY: 132AN XY: 727232 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000407 AC: 62AN: 152154Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000457 AC XY: 34AN XY: 74358 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O;C3281202:Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13;C5780022:Autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures Benign:1
This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (Highest reported MAF 0.8% (174/19950) (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/14-102467693-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as Likely benign or Benign (Variation ID:210869). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are limited or unavailable. Of note, this variant alters the consensus splice sequence (+/- 1,2) which may result in an absent or abnormal protein. However, further studies are needed to understand its impact. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease but requires further evidence. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at