NM_001378454.1:c.12175C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.12175C>T​(p.Leu4059Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.252 in 1,613,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62,464 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L4059L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.37 ( 13995 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.24 ( 48469 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.33

Publications

24 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
ALMS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alstrom syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.27).
BP6
Variant 2-73602245-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73602245-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 383765.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.33 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.703 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkc.12175C>T p.Leu4059Leu synonymous_variant Exon 20 of 23 ENST00000613296.6 NP_001365383.1
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkc.12175C>T p.Leu4059Leu synonymous_variant Exon 20 of 23 NP_055935.4 Q8TCU4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkc.12175C>T p.Leu4059Leu synonymous_variant Exon 20 of 23 1 NM_001378454.1 ENSP00000482968.1 Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.368
AC:
55947
AN:
151940
Hom.:
13938
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.709
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.285
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.366
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.158
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00715
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.148
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.243
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.215
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.238
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.323
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.260
AC:
65253
AN:
251166
AF XY:
0.242
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.722
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.402
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.151
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00566
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.232
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.235
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.236
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.240
AC:
351385
AN:
1461766
Hom.:
48469
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.236
AC XY:
171876
AN XY:
727166
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.715
AC:
23929
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.402
AC:
17972
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.151
AC:
3957
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
469
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.166
AC:
14276
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.231
AC:
12333
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.236
AC:
1364
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.236
AC:
262482
AN:
1111908
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.242
AC:
14603
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14813
29626
44440
59253
74066
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8996
17992
26988
35984
44980
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.369
AC:
56067
AN:
152058
Hom.:
13995
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.363
AC XY:
26980
AN XY:
74318
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.710
AC:
29418
AN:
41460
American (AMR)
AF:
0.366
AC:
5599
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.158
AC:
550
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00716
AC:
37
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.149
AC:
719
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.243
AC:
2566
AN:
10566
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.224
AC:
66
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.238
AC:
16179
AN:
67968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.319
AC:
674
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1444
2888
4331
5775
7219
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
468
936
1404
1872
2340
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.280
Hom.:
13684
Bravo
AF:
0.394
Asia WGS
AF:
0.118
AC:
409
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.230
EpiControl
AF:
0.235

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Sep 09, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Leu4058Leu in exon 20 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 80.11% (1059/1322) of African chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs1052162). -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Alstrom syndrome Benign:3
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 21, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
7.1
DANN
Benign
0.91
PhyloP100
2.3
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1052162; hg19: chr2-73829372; API