NM_001378454.1:c.6336T>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.6336T>A​(p.Ser2112Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.258 in 1,613,406 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 66,846 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S2112S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.39 ( 15917 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.24 ( 50929 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0800

Publications

35 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
ALMS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alstrom syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=9.135518E-7).
BP6
Variant 2-73452863-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73452863-T-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 383759.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.761 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkc.6336T>A p.Ser2112Arg missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 ENST00000613296.6 NP_001365383.1
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkc.6336T>A p.Ser2112Arg missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 NP_055935.4 Q8TCU4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkc.6336T>A p.Ser2112Arg missense_variant Exon 8 of 23 1 NM_001378454.1 ENSP00000482968.1 Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.387
AC:
58803
AN:
151986
Hom.:
15854
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.768
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.268
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.373
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.204
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00714
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.150
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.243
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.212
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.240
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.340
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.267
AC:
66163
AN:
248136
AF XY:
0.249
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.784
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.408
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00608
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.233
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.237
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.244
AC:
356982
AN:
1461302
Hom.:
50929
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.240
AC XY:
174574
AN XY:
726966
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.781
AC:
26153
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.409
AC:
18247
AN:
44660
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.204
AC:
5322
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0122
AC:
485
AN:
39668
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.167
AC:
14429
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.232
AC:
12330
AN:
53244
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.244
AC:
1407
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.237
AC:
263456
AN:
1111736
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.251
AC:
15153
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15759
31518
47278
63037
78796
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
9050
18100
27150
36200
45250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.387
AC:
58929
AN:
152104
Hom.:
15917
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.380
AC XY:
28281
AN XY:
74336
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.768
AC:
31883
AN:
41506
American (AMR)
AF:
0.373
AC:
5703
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.204
AC:
710
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00716
AC:
37
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.151
AC:
728
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.243
AC:
2574
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.221
AC:
65
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.239
AC:
16276
AN:
67964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.336
AC:
709
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1432
2863
4295
5726
7158
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
476
952
1428
1904
2380
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.274
Hom.:
2353
Bravo
AF:
0.416
TwinsUK
AF:
0.229
AC:
850
ALSPAC
AF:
0.234
AC:
901
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.740
AC:
2748
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.239
AC:
1956
ExAC
AF:
0.269
AC:
32471
Asia WGS
AF:
0.124
AC:
431
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.233
EpiControl
AF:
0.237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 09, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ser2111Arg in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 87.75% (1160/1322) of African chro mosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs6724782). -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Alstrom syndrome Benign:3
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 21, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.046
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.72
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.12
DANN
Benign
0.66
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0074
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0015
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.11
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
9.1e-7
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
PhyloP100
-0.080
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.63
T;T;T
Vest4
0.037
ClinPred
0.0043
T
GERP RS
-5.1
PromoterAI
0.0020
Neutral
Varity_R
0.026
gMVP
0.019
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6724782; hg19: chr2-73679990; COSMIC: COSV52517254; COSMIC: COSV52517254; API