NM_001378609.3:c.3020T>C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_001378609.3(OTOGL):c.3020T>C(p.Val1007Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000147 in 1,550,874 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1007F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00070 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000087 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOGL
NM_001378609.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.00

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOGL (HGNC:26901): (otogelin like) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the otogelin family. This gene is expressed in the inner ear of vertebrates with the highest level of expression seen at the embryonic stage and lowest in adult. Knockdown studies in zebrafish suggest that this gene is essential for normal inner ear function. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2012]

OTOGL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 84B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOGL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.021361202).

BP6

Variant 12-80296918-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-80296918-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 227818.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000702 (107/152328) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00231 (96/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00194. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 48 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOGL	NM_001378609.3 link	c.3020T>C	p.Val1007Ala	missense_variant	Exon 27 of 59	ENST00000547103.7	NP_001365538.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOGL	ENST00000547103.7 link	c.3020T>C	p.Val1007Ala	missense_variant	Exon 27 of 59	5	NM_001378609.3	ENSP00000447211.2		Q3ZCN5
OTOGL	ENST00000646859.1 link	c.2929-5716T>C		intron_variant	Intron 31 of 62			ENSP00000496036.1		A0A2R8YF04

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000703

AC:

107

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00232

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

173514

AF XY:

0.000183

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00169

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000291

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000134

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000209

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000865

AC:

121

AN:

1398546

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000853

AC XY:

AN XY:

691938

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00235

AC:

AN:

32700

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000391

AC:

AN:

38338

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25326

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000260

AC:

AN:

38390

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000747

AC:

AN:

80302

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

36452

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

5672

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000739

AC:

AN:

1083028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000223

AC:

AN:

58338

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.457

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000702

AC:

107

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000644

AC XY:

AN XY:

74490

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

41572

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000457

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000947

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.511

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000250

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000903

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00329

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000123

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000221

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 20, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Val998Ala in exon 26 of OTOGL: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.4% (11/2572) of African chromoso mes by the xome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; db SNP rs202051419). -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Feb 27, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Feb 24, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.41

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.39

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

Eigen

Uncertain

0.42

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.49

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Benign

0.59

.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.063

MetaRNN

Benign

0.021

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.32

PhyloP100

5.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.40

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.4

.;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.31

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

.;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0030

.;D

Vest4

0.35

MVP

0.49

MPC

0.026

ClinPred

0.039

GERP RS

5.6

gMVP

0.57

Mutation Taster

=52/48

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over