NM_001378609.3:c.3213+10C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001378609.3(OTOGL):​c.3213+10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00111 in 1,455,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

OTOGL
NM_001378609.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.675

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOGL (HGNC:26901): (otogelin like) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the otogelin family. This gene is expressed in the inner ear of vertebrates with the highest level of expression seen at the embryonic stage and lowest in adult. Knockdown studies in zebrafish suggest that this gene is essential for normal inner ear function. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2012]
OTOGL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 84B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 12-80302793-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-80302793-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 499957.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOGLNM_001378609.3 linkc.3213+10C>T intron_variant Intron 28 of 58 ENST00000547103.7 NP_001365538.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOGLENST00000547103.7 linkc.3213+10C>T intron_variant Intron 28 of 58 5 NM_001378609.3 ENSP00000447211.2 Q3ZCN5
OTOGLENST00000646859.1 linkc.3078+10C>T intron_variant Intron 32 of 62 ENSP00000496036.1 A0A2R8YF04

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00133
AC:
202
AN:
152092
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0406
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000706
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00336
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00244
AC:
311
AN:
127374
AF XY:
0.00204
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0440
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000854
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00290
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00108
AC:
1407
AN:
1302826
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00106
AC XY:
678
AN XY:
639978
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000106
AC:
3
AN:
28330
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000250
AC:
6
AN:
24000
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0364
AC:
764
AN:
20996
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35952
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000483
AC:
3
AN:
62174
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
34434
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000578
AC:
3
AN:
5190
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000440
AC:
457
AN:
1037732
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00317
AC:
171
AN:
54018
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
54
108
162
216
270
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
32
64
96
128
160
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00133
AC:
202
AN:
152210
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00121
AC XY:
90
AN XY:
74422
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000722
AC:
3
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0406
AC:
141
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10578
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000706
AC:
48
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
7
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9
17
26
34
43
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00663
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00147

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Feb 01, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 24, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

3186+10C>T in intron 27 of OTOGL: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus seq uence. It has been identified in 0.2% (20/8178) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.wa shington.edu/EVS). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.43
PhyloP100
-0.68
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201373228; hg19: chr12-80696573; API