NM_001378609.3:c.3488A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 1P and 11B. PP3BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001378609.3(OTOGL):​c.3488A>G​(p.Asp1163Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00217 in 1,612,464 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D1163E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

OTOGL
NM_001378609.3 missense

Scores

7
7
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.84

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOGL (HGNC:26901): (otogelin like) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the otogelin family. This gene is expressed in the inner ear of vertebrates with the highest level of expression seen at the embryonic stage and lowest in adult. Knockdown studies in zebrafish suggest that this gene is essential for normal inner ear function. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2012]
OTOGL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 84B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 7: BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, FATHMM_MKL, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL, REVEL [when max_spliceai, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10103613).
BP6
Variant 12-80313513-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-80313513-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 500879.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00176 (267/152118) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00244 (166/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00214. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 150 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOGLNM_001378609.3 linkc.3488A>G p.Asp1163Gly missense_variant Exon 31 of 59 ENST00000547103.7 NP_001365538.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOGLENST00000547103.7 linkc.3488A>G p.Asp1163Gly missense_variant Exon 31 of 59 5 NM_001378609.3 ENSP00000447211.2 Q3ZCN5
OTOGLENST00000646859.1 linkc.3353A>G p.Asp1118Gly missense_variant Exon 35 of 63 ENSP00000496036.1 A0A2R8YF04

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00176
AC:
267
AN:
152118
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000328
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00603
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00188
AC:
463
AN:
246684
AF XY:
0.00207
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000128
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00325
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00313
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000995
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00222
AC:
3239
AN:
1460346
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00217
AC XY:
1580
AN XY:
726546
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000239
AC:
8
AN:
33424
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000380
AC:
17
AN:
44700
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00165
AC:
43
AN:
26110
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39612
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000116
AC:
10
AN:
86216
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00275
AC:
147
AN:
53386
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00263
AC:
2926
AN:
1110810
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00141
AC:
85
AN:
60324
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.460
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
156
313
469
626
782
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
110
220
330
440
550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00176
AC:
267
AN:
152118
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00202
AC XY:
150
AN XY:
74312
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000483
AC:
20
AN:
41424
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000328
AC:
5
AN:
15264
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5194
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00603
AC:
64
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00244
AC:
166
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00239
AC:
5
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
24
37
49
61
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00209
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00118
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000230
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00163
AC:
14
ExAC
AF:
0.00227
AC:
275

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Sep 20, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Has not been previously reported in association with hearing loss to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23486545) -

Apr 03, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 84B Uncertain:1
Jul 16, 2018
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

not specified Benign:1
May 25, 2017
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Asp1154Gly in exon 30 of OTOGL: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.3% (408/124060) of European chr omosomes including 1 homozygote by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http ://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs202085918). -

OTOGL-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 22, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.11
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.38
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.65
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.68
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.19
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.10
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.62
D
PhyloP100
8.8
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.68
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.3
.;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.89
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
.;D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
.;.;D
Vest4
0.96
MVP
0.67
MPC
0.20
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
5.8
gMVP
0.87
Mutation Taster
=93/7
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs202085918; hg19: chr12-80707293; COSMIC: COSV101509570; API