NM_001387283.1:c.708T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_001387283.1(SMARCA4):​c.708T>C​(p.Pro236Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000361 in 1,540,592 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P236P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SMARCA4
NM_001387283.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.86

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SMARCA4 (HGNC:11100): (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the SWI/SNF family of proteins and is similar to the brahma protein of Drosophila. Members of this family have helicase and ATPase activities and are thought to regulate transcription of certain genes by altering the chromatin structure around those genes. The encoded protein is part of the large ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SNF/SWI, which is required for transcriptional activation of genes normally repressed by chromatin. In addition, this protein can bind BRCA1, as well as regulate the expression of the tumorigenic protein CD44. Mutations in this gene cause rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome type 2. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]
SMARCA4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Coffin-Siris syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Illumina
  • intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 16
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • uterine corpus sarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial rhabdoid tumor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 19-10986541-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10986541-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 212260.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.86 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00181 (276/152214) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0065 (270/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00586. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 125 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SMARCA4NM_001387283.1 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 36 ENST00000646693.2 NP_001374212.1
SMARCA4NM_003072.5 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 35 ENST00000344626.10 NP_003063.2 P51532-1A7E2E1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SMARCA4ENST00000646693.2 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 36 NM_001387283.1 ENSP00000495368.1 Q9HBD4
SMARCA4ENST00000344626.10 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 35 1 NM_003072.5 ENSP00000343896.4 P51532-1
SMARCA4ENST00000643549.1 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 35 ENSP00000493975.1 A0A2R8Y4P4
SMARCA4ENST00000541122.6 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 35 5 ENSP00000445036.2 P51532-4
SMARCA4ENST00000643296.1 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 34 ENSP00000496635.1 P51532-4
SMARCA4ENST00000644737.1 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 34 ENSP00000495548.1 P51532-4
SMARCA4ENST00000589677.5 linkc.708T>C p.Pro236Pro synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 35 5 ENSP00000464778.1 P51532-3
SMARCA4ENST00000643995.1 linkc.120T>C p.Pro40Pro synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 32 ENSP00000496004.1 A0A2R8YGG3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00181
AC:
276
AN:
152096
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00652
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000442
AC:
60
AN:
135696
AF XY:
0.000419
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000749
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000202
AC:
280
AN:
1388378
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000171
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
685210
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00681
AC:
215
AN:
31566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000393
AC:
14
AN:
35650
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000448
AC:
16
AN:
35724
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000632
AC:
5
AN:
79114
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39230
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000176
AC:
1
AN:
5692
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000927
AC:
10
AN:
1078388
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000328
AC:
19
AN:
57894
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
37
55
74
92
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00181
AC:
276
AN:
152214
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00168
AC XY:
125
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00650
AC:
270
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000194
AC:
1
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
67986
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000946
AC:
2
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
29
43
58
72
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000696
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00213
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Oct 25, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SMARCA4: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
Apr 24, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 06, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Jun 22, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 01, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 16 Benign:1
Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Coffin-Siris syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
0.094
DANN
Benign
0.33
PhyloP100
-1.9
PromoterAI
0.0021
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs62639303; hg19: chr19-11097217; API