NM_001457.4:c.4173A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001457.4(FLNB):​c.4173A>G​(p.Ala1391Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.668 in 1,612,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 366,694 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.73 ( 41517 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.66 ( 325177 hom. )

Consequence

FLNB
NM_001457.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.252

Publications

26 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FLNB (HGNC:3755): (filamin B) This gene encodes a member of the filamin family. The encoded protein interacts with glycoprotein Ib alpha as part of the process to repair vascular injuries. The platelet glycoprotein Ib complex includes glycoprotein Ib alpha, and it binds the actin cytoskeleton. Mutations in this gene have been found in several conditions: atelosteogenesis type 1 and type 3; boomerang dysplasia; autosomal dominant Larsen syndrome; and spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants that encode different protein isoforms have been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
FLNB Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • atelosteogenesis type I
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
  • atelosteogenesis type III
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
  • Larsen syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
  • spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
  • Boomerang dysplasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 3-58126713-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-58126713-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258110.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.252 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.975 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FLNBNM_001457.4 linkc.4173A>G p.Ala1391Ala synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 46 ENST00000295956.9 NP_001448.2 O75369-1
FLNBNM_001164317.2 linkc.4173A>G p.Ala1391Ala synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 47 NP_001157789.1 O75369-8
FLNBNM_001164318.2 linkc.4173A>G p.Ala1391Ala synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 46 NP_001157790.1 O75369-9
FLNBNM_001164319.2 linkc.4173A>G p.Ala1391Ala synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 45 NP_001157791.1 O75369-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FLNBENST00000295956.9 linkc.4173A>G p.Ala1391Ala synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 46 1 NM_001457.4 ENSP00000295956.5 O75369-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.728
AC:
110523
AN:
151892
Hom.:
41454
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.894
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.638
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.719
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.659
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.997
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.781
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.589
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.636
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.631
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.711
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.707
AC:
177678
AN:
251412
AF XY:
0.699
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.904
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.774
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.661
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.999
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.589
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.626
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.681
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.662
AC:
966804
AN:
1460028
Hom.:
325177
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
0.663
AC XY:
481759
AN XY:
726522
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.906
AC:
30316
AN:
33450
American (AMR)
AF:
0.768
AC:
34360
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.660
AC:
17247
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.999
AC:
39658
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.751
AC:
64746
AN:
86218
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.589
AC:
31437
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.685
AC:
3946
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.633
AC:
703102
AN:
1110304
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.696
AC:
41992
AN:
60340
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.455
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15648
31296
46943
62591
78239
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18870
37740
56610
75480
94350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.728
AC:
110645
AN:
152010
Hom.:
41517
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.731
AC XY:
54323
AN XY:
74276
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.895
AC:
37097
AN:
41468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.720
AC:
10984
AN:
15266
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.659
AC:
2284
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.997
AC:
5156
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.780
AC:
3756
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.589
AC:
6197
AN:
10522
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.653
AC:
192
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.631
AC:
42886
AN:
67984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.715
AC:
1511
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1423
2846
4270
5693
7116
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
836
1672
2508
3344
4180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.672
Hom.:
26891
Bravo
AF:
0.746
EpiCase
AF:
0.640
EpiControl
AF:
0.637

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

FLNB-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
-0.25
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2362903; hg19: chr3-58112440; COSMIC: COSV55889191; API