NM_001482.3:c.*125G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001482.3(GATM):c.*125G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00251 in 700,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001482.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- AGAT deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- Fanconi renotubular syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- primary Fanconi syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001482.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GATM | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*125G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000379895.3 | P50440-1 | |||
| GATM | TSL:1 | n.3053G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 8 of 8 | |||||
| GATM | c.*125G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000557776.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00695 AC: 1057AN: 152126Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00129 AC: 705AN: 548480Hom.: 5 Cov.: 5 AF XY: 0.00106 AC XY: 312AN XY: 294938 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00692 AC: 1054AN: 152244Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00627 AC XY: 467AN XY: 74442 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at