NM_001796.5:c.2210C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
The NM_001796.5(CDH8):c.2210C>T(p.Thr737Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000682 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001796.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001796.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDH8 | NM_001796.5 | MANE Select | c.2210C>T | p.Thr737Met | missense | Exon 12 of 12 | NP_001787.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDH8 | ENST00000577390.6 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2210C>T | p.Thr737Met | missense | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000462701.1 | P55286 | |
| CDH8 | ENST00000958085.1 | c.2210C>T | p.Thr737Met | missense | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000628144.1 | |||
| CDH8 | ENST00000299345.10 | TSL:5 | c.2126+84C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000299345.6 | X6R3Y6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251318 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000684 AC: 10AN: 1461870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74340 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at