NM_001854.4:c.2921C>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001854.4(COL11A1):c.2921C>A(p.Pro974Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00249 in 1,613,922 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P974T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001854.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Marshall syndromeInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- Stickler syndrome type 2Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
- fibrochondrogenesis 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hearing loss, autosomal dominant 37Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- autosomal dominant myopia-midfacial retrusion-sensorineural hearing loss-rhizomelic dysplasia syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- fibrochondrogenesisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- autosomal recessive Stickler syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001854.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL11A1 | NM_001854.4 | MANE Select | c.2921C>A | p.Pro974Gln | missense | Exon 39 of 67 | NP_001845.3 | ||
| COL11A1 | NM_080629.3 | c.2957C>A | p.Pro986Gln | missense | Exon 39 of 67 | NP_542196.2 | |||
| COL11A1 | NM_001190709.2 | c.2804C>A | p.Pro935Gln | missense | Exon 38 of 66 | NP_001177638.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL11A1 | ENST00000370096.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2921C>A | p.Pro974Gln | missense | Exon 39 of 67 | ENSP00000359114.3 | ||
| COL11A1 | ENST00000512756.5 | TSL:1 | c.2573C>A | p.Pro858Gln | missense | Exon 37 of 65 | ENSP00000426533.1 | ||
| COL11A1 | ENST00000635193.1 | TSL:1 | n.*171C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 36 of 64 | ENSP00000489428.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00202 AC: 307AN: 152110Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00172 AC: 433AN: 251258 AF XY: 0.00171 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00254 AC: 3719AN: 1461694Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00256 AC XY: 1862AN XY: 727162 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00202 AC: 307AN: 152228Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00169 AC XY: 126AN XY: 74434 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
COL11A1: PP3, BS1, BS2
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22995991, 15922184, 30753492, 33570564)
Connective tissue disorder Uncertain:1Benign:1
not specified Benign:1
COL11A1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at