NM_001854.4:c.4512T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001854.4(COL11A1):​c.4512T>C​(p.Gly1504Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.746 in 1,611,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 457,887 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.65 ( 35478 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.76 ( 422409 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A1
NM_001854.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.219

Publications

33 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL11A1 (HGNC:2186): (collagen type XI alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type II Stickler syndrome and with Marshall syndrome. A single-nucleotide polymorphism in this gene is also associated with susceptibility to lumbar disc herniation. Multiple transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
COL11A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Marshall syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Stickler syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • fibrochondrogenesis 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hearing loss, autosomal dominant 37
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • autosomal dominant myopia-midfacial retrusion-sensorineural hearing loss-rhizomelic dysplasia syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • fibrochondrogenesis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 1-102888872-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-102888872-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258466.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.783 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL11A1NM_001854.4 linkc.4512T>C p.Gly1504Gly synonymous_variant Exon 60 of 67 ENST00000370096.9 NP_001845.3 P12107-1Q59HB5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL11A1ENST00000370096.9 linkc.4512T>C p.Gly1504Gly synonymous_variant Exon 60 of 67 1 NM_001854.4 ENSP00000359114.3 P12107-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.651
AC:
98840
AN:
151896
Hom.:
35469
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.315
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.780
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.795
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.803
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.742
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.645
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.806
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.804
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.780
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.712
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.737
AC:
184970
AN:
251086
AF XY:
0.739
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.304
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.825
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.794
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.720
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.808
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.777
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.774
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.756
AC:
1103516
AN:
1459896
Hom.:
422409
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.755
AC XY:
548116
AN XY:
726384
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.293
AC:
9803
AN:
33434
American (AMR)
AF:
0.822
AC:
36745
AN:
44690
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.796
AC:
20798
AN:
26112
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.699
AC:
27717
AN:
39678
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.653
AC:
56299
AN:
86204
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.804
AC:
42944
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.772
AC:
4447
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.774
AC:
859883
AN:
1110266
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.744
AC:
44880
AN:
60340
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13949
27898
41847
55796
69745
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20318
40636
60954
81272
101590
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.650
AC:
98867
AN:
152014
Hom.:
35478
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.655
AC XY:
48665
AN XY:
74294
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.314
AC:
13030
AN:
41436
American (AMR)
AF:
0.795
AC:
12138
AN:
15262
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.803
AC:
2787
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.742
AC:
3826
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.645
AC:
3101
AN:
4808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.806
AC:
8522
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.803
AC:
236
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.780
AC:
53006
AN:
67992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.715
AC:
1511
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1438
2876
4315
5753
7191
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
772
1544
2316
3088
3860
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.724
Hom.:
90797
Bravo
AF:
0.639
Asia WGS
AF:
0.683
AC:
2374
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.781
EpiControl
AF:
0.785

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 29, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fibrochondrogenesis 1 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Stickler syndrome type 2 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hearing loss, autosomal dominant 37 Benign:1
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Marshall syndrome Benign:1
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.79
PhyloP100
0.22
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1763347; hg19: chr1-103354428; COSMIC: COSV62176467; COSMIC: COSV62176467; API