NM_001875.5:c.2679C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001875.5(CPS1):c.2679C>G(p.Gly893Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.572 in 1,585,376 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 264,621 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001875.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- carbamoyl phosphate synthetase I deficiency diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS1 | NM_001875.5 | c.2679C>G | p.Gly893Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 21 of 38 | ENST00000233072.10 | NP_001866.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.644 AC: 97609AN: 151646Hom.: 32953 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.578 AC: 144700AN: 250550 AF XY: 0.580 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.564 AC: 808754AN: 1433612Hom.: 231606 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.567 AC XY: 405554AN XY: 715026 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.644 AC: 97724AN: 151764Hom.: 33015 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.643 AC XY: 47734AN XY: 74180 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital hyperammonemia, type I Benign:6
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:5
- -
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Variant summary: The CPS1 c.2679C>G (p.Gly893Gly) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide causing a synonymous change that 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may remove ESE binding sites. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 71012/121158 control chromosomes (21467 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.5861107, which is approximately 371 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CPS1 variant (0.0015811) and indicates that the variant is the major allele (the allele most commonly seen in the general population). Therefore, suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as "likely benign/benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. -
- -
GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at