NM_001880.4:c.1186-3055G>T
Variant names: 
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001880.4(ATF2):c.1186-3055G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.261 in 151,800 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,154 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
 Genomes: 𝑓 0.26   (  6154   hom.,  cov: 32) 
Consequence
 ATF2
NM_001880.4 intron
NM_001880.4 intron
Scores
 2
Clinical Significance
 Not reported in ClinVar 
Conservation
 PhyloP100:  -1.68  
Publications
4 publications found 
Genes affected
 ATF2  (HGNC:784):  (activating transcription factor 2) This gene encodes a transcription factor that is a member of the leucine zipper family of DNA binding proteins. The encoded protein has been identified as a moonlighting protein based on its ability to perform mechanistically distinct functions This protein binds to the cAMP-responsive element (CRE), an octameric palindrome. It forms a homodimer or a heterodimer with c-Jun and stimulates CRE-dependent transcription. This protein is also a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) that specifically acetylates histones H2B and H4 in vitro; thus it may represent a class of sequence-specific factors that activate transcription by direct effects on chromatin components. The encoded protein may also be involved in cell's DNA damage response independent of its role in transcriptional regulation. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014] 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-1.05). 
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.436  is higher than 0.05. 
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.261  AC: 39605AN: 151682Hom.:  6129  Cov.: 32 show subpopulations 
GnomAD3 genomes 
 AF: 
AC: 
39605
AN: 
151682
Hom.: 
Cov.: 
32
Gnomad AFR 
 AF: 
Gnomad AMI 
 AF: 
Gnomad AMR 
 AF: 
Gnomad ASJ 
 AF: 
Gnomad EAS 
 AF: 
Gnomad SAS 
 AF: 
Gnomad FIN 
 AF: 
Gnomad MID 
 AF: 
Gnomad NFE 
 AF: 
Gnomad OTH 
 AF: 
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome  0.261  AC: 39667AN: 151800Hom.:  6154  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.257  AC XY: 19083AN XY: 74180 show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 genome 
 AF: 
AC: 
39667
AN: 
151800
Hom.: 
Cov.: 
32
 AF XY: 
AC XY: 
19083
AN XY: 
74180
show subpopulations 
African (AFR) 
 AF: 
AC: 
18261
AN: 
41358
American (AMR) 
 AF: 
AC: 
4009
AN: 
15226
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) 
 AF: 
AC: 
816
AN: 
3464
East Asian (EAS) 
 AF: 
AC: 
666
AN: 
5160
South Asian (SAS) 
 AF: 
AC: 
935
AN: 
4804
European-Finnish (FIN) 
 AF: 
AC: 
1291
AN: 
10576
Middle Eastern (MID) 
 AF: 
AC: 
86
AN: 
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE) 
 AF: 
AC: 
12945
AN: 
67894
Other (OTH) 
 AF: 
AC: 
555
AN: 
2112
 Allele Balance Distribution 
 Red line indicates average allele balance 
 Average allele balance: 0.501 
Heterozygous variant carriers
 0 
 1397 
 2795 
 4192 
 5590 
 6987 
 0.00 
 0.20 
 0.40 
 0.60 
 0.80 
 0.95 
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
 0 
 384 
 768 
 1152 
 1536 
 1920 
 <30 
 30-35 
 35-40 
 40-45 
 45-50 
 50-55 
 55-60 
 60-65 
 65-70 
 70-75 
 75-80 
 >80 
Age
Alfa 
 AF: 
Hom.: 
Bravo 
 AF: 
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source: 
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
 BayesDel_noAF 
 Benign 
 DANN 
 Benign 
 PhyloP100 
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
 SpliceAI score (max) 
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at 
Publications
 You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.