NM_001902.6:c.718C>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Moderate
The NM_001902.6(CTH):c.718C>A(p.Gln240Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000718 in 1,393,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q240E) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001902.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cystathioninuriaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001902.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTH | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.718C>A | p.Gln240Lys | missense | Exon 7 of 12 | ENSP00000359976.3 | P32929-1 | ||
| CTH | TSL:1 | c.586C>A | p.Gln196Lys | missense | Exon 6 of 11 | ENSP00000311554.2 | P32929-2 | ||
| CTH | c.718C>A | p.Gln240Lys | missense | Exon 8 of 13 | ENSP00000566259.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.18e-7 AC: 1AN: 1393214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 697500 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at