NM_001985.3:c.491G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_001985.3(ETFB):c.491G>C(p.Arg164Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000124 in 1,612,794 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R164W) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001985.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001985.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETFB | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.491G>C | p.Arg164Pro | missense | Exon 5 of 6 | ENSP00000311930.3 | P38117-1 | ||
| ETFB | TSL:1 | c.764G>C | p.Arg255Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 5 | ENSP00000346173.3 | P38117-2 | ||
| ETFB | c.566G>C | p.Arg189Pro | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | ENSP00000573368.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460646Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726422 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74324 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at