NM_002027.3:c.182C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_002027.3(FNTA):c.182C>T(p.Pro61Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000645 in 1,395,480 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002027.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002027.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNTA | NM_002027.3 | MANE Select | c.182C>T | p.Pro61Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 9 | NP_002018.1 | P49354-1 | |
| FNTA | NR_033698.2 | n.206C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 8 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNTA | ENST00000302279.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.182C>T | p.Pro61Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 9 | ENSP00000303423.3 | P49354-1 | |
| FNTA | ENST00000526755.5 | TSL:1 | n.182C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 8 | ENSP00000437208.1 | E9PK84 | ||
| ENSG00000254673 | ENST00000534420.1 | TSL:4 | n.71-2564C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000435061.2 | H0YE66 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000645 AC: 9AN: 1395480Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000723 AC XY: 5AN XY: 691274 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at