NM_002047.4:c.222+5C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_002047.4(GARS1):c.222+5C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0984 in 1,535,676 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,528 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002047.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARS1 | ENST00000389266.8 | c.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | 1 | NM_002047.4 | ENSP00000373918.3 | |||
| GARS1 | ENST00000675651.1 | c.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502513.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000675810.1 | c.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 15 | ENSP00000502743.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000675693.1 | c.54+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 17 | ENSP00000502174.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000675051.1 | c.22-3648C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502296.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000674815.1 | c.-148+196C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502799.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000674851.1 | c.-148+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 17 | ENSP00000502451.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000444666.6 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 17 | 3 | ENSP00000415447.2 | ||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000674616.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 17 | ENSP00000502408.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000674643.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | ENSP00000501636.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000674737.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 17 | ENSP00000502464.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000674807.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 15 | ENSP00000502814.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000675529.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 17 | ENSP00000501655.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000675859.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 14 | ENSP00000502033.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000676088.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 18 | ENSP00000501884.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000676140.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502571.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000676164.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | ENSP00000501986.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000676210.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 17 | ENSP00000502373.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000676259.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | ENSP00000501980.1 | |||||
| GARS1 | ENST00000676403.1 | n.222+5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 1 of 15 | ENSP00000502681.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.102 AC: 15547AN: 152122Hom.: 880 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.113 AC: 15584AN: 138328 AF XY: 0.117 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0980 AC: 135578AN: 1383436Hom.: 7646 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.100 AC XY: 68563AN XY: 682804 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.102 AC: 15558AN: 152240Hom.: 882 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.103 AC XY: 7671AN XY: 74442 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
- -
- -
- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
- -
Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at