NM_002166.5:c.262C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_002166.5(ID2):c.262C>G(p.Leu88Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,508 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002166.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital heart diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002166.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID2 | NM_002166.5 | MANE Select | c.262C>G | p.Leu88Val | missense | Exon 1 of 3 | NP_002157.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID2 | ENST00000396290.2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.262C>G | p.Leu88Val | missense | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000379585.1 | Q02363 | |
| ID2 | ENST00000234091.8 | TSL:1 | c.262C>G | p.Leu88Val | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000234091.4 | Q02363 | |
| ID2 | ENST00000331129.3 | TSL:1 | c.262C>G | p.Leu88Val | missense | Exon 1 of 2 | ENSP00000385465.2 | Q02363 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461508Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727058 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at