NM_002218.5:c.2092C>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BA1
The NM_002218.5(ITIH4):c.2092C>A(p.Pro698Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.264 in 1,601,242 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58,684 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002218.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITIH4 | ENST00000266041.9 | c.2092C>A | p.Pro698Thr | missense_variant | Exon 18 of 24 | 1 | NM_002218.5 | ENSP00000266041.4 | ||
| ENSG00000243696 | ENST00000468472.1 | n.*3462C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 20 of 24 | 2 | ENSP00000422253.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000243696 | ENST00000468472.1 | n.*3462C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 20 of 24 | 2 | ENSP00000422253.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.269 AC: 40896AN: 151830Hom.: 5854 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.281 AC: 64561AN: 229774 AF XY: 0.267 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.264 AC: 382228AN: 1449294Hom.: 52833 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.259 AC XY: 186570AN XY: 719900 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.269 AC: 40909AN: 151948Hom.: 5851 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.270 AC XY: 20052AN XY: 74268 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
ITIH4-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at