NM_002224.4:c.8011C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_002224.4(ITPR3):c.8011C>T(p.Arg2671Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000155 in 1,613,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002224.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPR3 | ENST00000605930.3 | c.8011C>T | p.Arg2671Cys | missense_variant | Exon 58 of 58 | 1 | NM_002224.4 | ENSP00000475177.1 | ||
ITPR3 | ENST00000374316.9 | c.8011C>T | p.Arg2671Cys | missense_variant | Exon 59 of 59 | 5 | ENSP00000363435.4 | |||
UQCC2 | ENST00000374231.8 | c.*31-327G>A | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 4 | 3 | ENSP00000363348.4 | ||||
UQCC2 | ENST00000606961.1 | n.2883G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | 6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251364Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135846
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000164 AC: 24AN: 1461708Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74376
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.8011C>T (p.R2671C) alteration is located in exon 58 (coding exon 58) of the ITPR3 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 8011, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 2671 to be replaced by a cysteine (C). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at