NM_002256.4:c.*70C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_002256.4(KISS1):c.*70C>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.301 in 505,596 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27,611 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002256.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy type 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- renal tubular dysgenesis of genetic originInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002256.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KISS1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*70C>G | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000356162.4 | Q15726 | |||
| KISS1 | c.*70C>G | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000552504.1 | |||||
| REN | TSL:5 | c.-393C>G | upstream_gene | N/A | ENSP00000490307.1 | A0A1B0GUZ2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.431 AC: 50297AN: 116610Hom.: 10794 Cov.: 21 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.262 AC: 101992AN: 388892Hom.: 16779 Cov.: 4 AF XY: 0.271 AC XY: 55650AN XY: 205232 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.432 AC: 50390AN: 116704Hom.: 10832 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.428 AC XY: 24124AN XY: 56340 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at