NM_002291.3:c.3065A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_002291.3(LAMB1):c.3065A>G(p.Gln1022Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.637 in 1,612,288 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 329,260 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002291.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cobblestone lissencephaly without muscular or ocular involvementInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMB1 | NM_002291.3 | c.3065A>G | p.Gln1022Arg | missense_variant | Exon 22 of 34 | ENST00000222399.11 | NP_002282.2 | |
| LAMB1 | XM_047420359.1 | c.3065A>G | p.Gln1022Arg | missense_variant | Exon 22 of 28 | XP_047276315.1 | ||
| LAMB1 | XM_047420360.1 | c.3065A>G | p.Gln1022Arg | missense_variant | Exon 22 of 25 | XP_047276316.1 | 
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  0.665  AC: 100994AN: 151960Hom.:  33715  Cov.: 32 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.647  AC: 162392AN: 251096 AF XY:  0.641   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.634  AC: 925847AN: 1460210Hom.:  295508  Cov.: 37 AF XY:  0.632  AC XY: 459444AN XY: 726488 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  0.665  AC: 101087AN: 152078Hom.:  33752  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.667  AC XY: 49608AN XY: 74320 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided    Benign:2 
- -
- -
not specified    Benign:1 
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at