NM_002473.6:c.11A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.11A>G(p.Gln4Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000427 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002473.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- May-Hegglin anomalyInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYH9 | NM_002473.6 | c.11A>G | p.Gln4Arg | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 41 | ENST00000216181.11 | NP_002464.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000322 AC: 8AN: 248786 AF XY: 0.0000371 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000458 AC: 67AN: 1461834Hom.: 3 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000385 AC XY: 28AN XY: 727220 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74360 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
The MYH9 c.11A>G (p.Gln4Arg) variant identified in this individual was previously classified as a variant of uncertain significance on the original report issued 09/09/2022. Since the original reporting of this variant, updated population data indicates that this variant is present in the population at an allele frequency higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has been identified in 16/44,892 East Asian chromosomes (69/1,614,046 chromosomes overall including 3 homozyous individuals) by the Genome Aggregation Database v4.1.0 (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). This additional information provides sufficient evidence to update the classification of the MYH9 c.11A>G (p.Gln4Arg) variant to likely benign. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.11A>G (p.Q4R) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 1) of the MYH9 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 11, causing the glutamine (Q) at amino acid position 4 to be replaced by an arginine (R). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not specified Benign:1
p.Gln4Arg in exon 2 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because although the glutamine (Gln) at position 4 is conserved in mamm als, it is not conserved in evolutionary distant species, with over 10 species ( birds, reptiles, fish) having an arginine (Arg). It has been identified in 3/85 94 East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac .broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs773960235). In summary, this information indicates that this variant is likely benign. -
MYH9-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at