NM_002528.7:c.274C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BP6BS2
The NM_002528.7(NTHL1):c.274C>T(p.Arg92Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 1,613,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R92P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002528.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial adenomatous polyposis 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- NTHL1-deficiency tumor predisposition syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- breast cancerInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- meningiomaInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000894 AC: 136AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000916 AC: 230AN: 250962 AF XY: 0.000986 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00134 AC: 1961AN: 1460922Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00136 AC XY: 991AN XY: 726736 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000887 AC: 135AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000806 AC XY: 60AN XY: 74438 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:5Benign:3
- -
- -
NTHL1: BP1 -
- -
Observed in individuals with ovarian cancer, breast cancer, adenomatous polyps, and leukemia (PMID: 30584090, 33332384, 33980861, 37834005); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30584090, 29641532, 33980861, 33332384, 20054297, 32906206, 37834005) -
- -
- -
- -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 3 Uncertain:3
The NTHL1 c.274C>T (p.Arg92Cys) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.13% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a deleterious effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in individuals with colorectal cancer, breast cancer and precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PMID: 32620917, 32295625, 32620917). It has also been identified in 3/1358 non-cancer controls collected as part of a study of individuals with multiple primary cancers (PMID: 29641532). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with NTHL1-associated polyposis. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:2
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
NTHL1-deficiency tumor predisposition syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
NTHL1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at