NM_002529.4:c.1728C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002529.4(NTRK1):​c.1728C>T​(p.Phe576Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00114 in 1,613,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0054 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00070 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

NTRK1
NM_002529.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.45

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NTRK1 (HGNC:8031): (neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1) This gene encodes a member of the neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor (NTKR) family. This kinase is a membrane-bound receptor that, upon neurotrophin binding, phosphorylates itself and members of the MAPK pathway. The presence of this kinase leads to cell differentiation and may play a role in specifying sensory neuron subtypes. Mutations in this gene have been associated with congenital insensitivity to pain, anhidrosis, self-mutilating behavior, cognitive disability and cancer. Alternate transcriptional splice variants of this gene have been found, but only three have been characterized to date. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NTRK1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial medullary thyroid carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 1-156876495-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-156876495-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 292890.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.45 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00538 (820/152288) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0168 (699/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0158. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 389 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NTRK1NM_002529.4 linkc.1728C>T p.Phe576Phe synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENST00000524377.7 NP_002520.2 P04629-1
NTRK1NM_001012331.2 linkc.1710C>T p.Phe570Phe synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 16 NP_001012331.1 P04629-2X5DR71
NTRK1NM_001007792.1 linkc.1620C>T p.Phe540Phe synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 NP_001007793.1 P04629-3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NTRK1ENST00000524377.7 linkc.1728C>T p.Phe576Phe synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 1 NM_002529.4 ENSP00000431418.1 P04629-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00537
AC:
817
AN:
152170
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00563
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00170
AC:
425
AN:
250620
AF XY:
0.00146
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00211
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000545
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000274
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000980
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000697
AC:
1019
AN:
1461458
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000699
AC XY:
508
AN XY:
727044
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0154
AC:
516
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00215
AC:
96
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
31
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
92
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53046
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00451
AC:
26
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000139
AC:
155
AN:
1111990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
100
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
69
138
206
275
344
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00538
AC:
820
AN:
152288
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00522
AC XY:
389
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0168
AC:
699
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00562
AC:
86
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000576
AC:
2
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000622
AC:
3
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000309
AC:
21
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00379
AC:
8
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
44
87
131
174
218
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00199
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00564
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis Benign:4
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jul 11, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
3.4
DANN
Benign
0.94
PhyloP100
-1.5
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6335; hg19: chr1-156846287; COSMIC: COSV104662699; API