NM_002819.5:c.82C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_002819.5(PTBP1):c.82C>T(p.Pro28Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000015 in 1,461,860 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002819.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002819.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTBP1 | MANE Select | c.82C>T | p.Pro28Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 15 | NP_002810.1 | P26599-3 | ||
| PTBP1 | c.88C>T | p.Pro30Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 15 | NP_001398069.1 | A0A7I2V621 | |||
| PTBP1 | c.82C>T | p.Pro28Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 15 | NP_114367.1 | P26599-2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTBP1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.82C>T | p.Pro28Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 15 | ENSP00000349428.4 | P26599-3 | ||
| PTBP1 | TSL:1 | c.82C>T | p.Pro28Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 15 | ENSP00000408096.1 | P26599-2 | ||
| PTBP1 | TSL:1 | c.82C>T | p.Pro28Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 14 | ENSP00000014112.5 | P26599-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000318 AC: 8AN: 251408 AF XY: 0.0000515 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000150 AC: 22AN: 1461860Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000248 AC XY: 18AN XY: 727236 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at